Visit Modern Campus

From Names to Numbers: The Retention Dilemma in Small Colleges

AdobeStock_91081169
Facing the looming enrollment cliff, higher ed institutions are heavily prioritizing enrollment at the expense of retention. But seeking to serve their diverse learners by meeting their needs will help these institutions attain their numbers without compromising the student experience.

Small colleges often tout the idea that students are more than just numbers. They promise an educational experience that encourages knowing each student by name and nurtures personal growth and academic success. However, when these institutions focus on increasing enrollment at the expense of retention, they ironically end up treating students as mere statistics. This focus on enrollment over nurturing leads to what we call the retention dilemma. 

This dilemma is especially pronounced during times like now, when university administrators are making another enrollment push. As the new semester approaches, university officials will share year-over-year data, comparing today’s enrollment to last year’s at the same point. This analysis not only helps spot trends or anomalies but also reveals how the drive for higher enrollment numbers can overshadow the commitment to nurturing student success. Driven by these insights, administrators will actively work to understand any enrollment gaps. They will often prioritize solutions that boost numbers rather than ensure student retention and well-being by doing things like expanding recruitment efforts or launching new programs designed to attract more students rather than supporting those already enrolled. 

This emphasis on numbers becomes even clearer when we see how record student enrollments are frequently celebrated in press releases. While these figures make headlines, retention rates remain the underreported story. The rush to break enrollment records can overshadow the need for sustainable growth. Conversely, retention rates provide a more accurate depiction of true growth, revealing how well an institution supports its students beyond just getting them through the door. This pervasive focus on enrollment at the cost of nurturing student development is the heart of the retention dilemma. 

The Retention Dilemma 

Universities need to nurture each student’s journey from enrollment to graduation. High enrollment without corresponding retention efforts can lead to high attrition rates. Students from underrepresented or first-generation backgrounds are especially at risk, finding themselves in environments where the focus isn’t on nurturing their academic and personal growth but on merely increasing numbers. These students often lack the support systems or cultural capital that more traditional students might have, thus making them more susceptible to dropping out if they feel disconnected or unsupported. 

However, it’s also important to acknowledge that some institutions, particularly those in areas with declining student populations, might genuinely need to focus on enrollment for survival. For these colleges, maintaining a viable student body is a matter of keeping the institution’s doors open. However, even in these scenarios, the approach to enrollment should be paired with strategies to keep students engaged and committed to their education. 

The Role of Performative PR 

The use of press releases to celebrate enrollment can sometimes be misleading, portraying thriving institutions while potentially masking issues like poor retention, student dissatisfaction or inadequate support systems. Not all such communications are purely performative; they can also serve to inform stakeholders of institutional growth or strategic directions, which is crucial for transparency and accountability. But when these announcements fail to mention retention strategies or student support initiatives, they contribute to a culture that celebrates the quantity of students more than their quality of experience. 

Balancing the Metrics 

It’s time for educational institutions to adopt a more holistic approach. A balanced scorecard where retention, graduation rates and student satisfaction are as critical as enrollment numbers could transform educational priorities. Redirecting resources toward student support services like academic advising, mental health and basic needs support is essential. Moreover, press releases should not only celebrate new enrollments but also discuss retention strategies, successes and areas needing improvement. This approach fosters a culture of transparency. This shift would require a cultural change within institutions, where the success of each student is championed as much as institutional growth. 

Practical Solutions and Success Stories 

Several institutions have already begun to pivot toward retention, with programs like early warning systems for at-risk students, guided pathways, intrusive advising and mentorship programs showing positive outcomes. For instance, some universities have reported increased retention rates after implementing comprehensive support systems that address both academic and personal student needs. When introducing or modifying academic programs, a retention-focused approach that includes engaging curricula, clear career pathways and practical experience is vital. Success stories from these universities often highlight how personalized support and innovative teaching methods have reduced dropout rates and improved student satisfaction. 

Acknowledging Complexity 

The challenge of balancing enrollment and retention is nuanced. Financial pressures, demographic changes and the need for institutional reputation can all influence an educational institution’s priorities. However, the ultimate goal should be to create an environment where every student who enters an institution is supported to thrive, not just to count toward statistics. Understanding the unique needs of diverse student populations and adapting institutional practices can help in achieving this balance. 

Looking Forward 

The obsession with enrollment numbers without a corresponding commitment to retention has its pitfalls, but it’s not the whole picture. As we move forward, let’s champion a narrative where student transformation is as celebrated as new student numbers. By valuing every student’s journey, we can redefine success in higher education, with new and modified academic programs playing a crucial role in this paradigm shift. The future of small colleges—and indeed all educational institutions—hinges on their ability to genuinely live up to the promise of treating each student as an individual with unique needs and aspirations rather than just another number in the enrollment tally.