Published on
Why the Digital Humanities Matter
One of the ways I believe we can overcome this perception is with a relatively new discipline called the Digital Humanities (DH). DH practitioners experiment in the area “born of the encounter between traditional humanities and computational methods.”[3]
Though the DH name did not exist prior to 2004, pioneering efforts began with Jesuit priest Roberto Busa who, working with IBM in the 1950s, developed a computer-generated concordance to the writings of Thomas Aquinas (that can be found today at http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/). DH projects increased dramatically with the advent of the Internet and more powerful computer technology. Today, we’re seeing important DH projects that focus on curating knowledge that was actually “born digital.”[4]
Why are projects like this needed now more than ever? Research is fundamentally different than it was just a short time ago. As David Berry wrote in “Understanding Digital Humanities,” “it is becoming more and more evident that research is increasingly being mediated through digital technology.”[5] Technology is bringing a revolutionary change to what it means to conduct research in the humanities and across all scholarly disciplines.
Here are two personal examples. When I was working on my master’s degree in history at the University of Akron in 1992, one of my professors told me not to use the computer system in the library to find books. She said it was much more thorough to use the paper-based card catalog system because the computer system failed to account for many books in the physical collection.
Things began to change when I moved to Case Western Reserve University to work on my Ph.D. I completed my Ph.D. in history in 1999 and, at that time, Yahoo! Internet Life ranked the university as the “Nation’s Most Wired Campus.” Nevertheless, when writing my dissertation on the history of the information explosion, I spent all of my time in a physical library and archives. There were simply no digitized databases that could assist me with my research.
Today, almost everything has changed. I am a professor of history at an online university, we have a wonderful digital library and new primary sources are digitized and made available online every day.
We desperately need a discipline whose sole purpose is to investigate, experiment with and create meanings for this new electronic world of information. That is the role of DH today.
I firmly believe the growing vigor and sophistication of DH will serve as an antidote to the persistent rumors that the humanities are in crisis. As Mark Twain famously said in 1897, “The report of my death was an exaggeration.” I can assure you, the humanities are alive, well and thriving in the digital world of the 21st century.
– – – –
References
[1] Jennifer Levitz and Douglas Belkin, “Humanities Fall From Favor,” The Wall Street Journal, June 6, 2013. Accessed at http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887324069104578527642373232184
[2] David Sibley, “A Crisis in the Humanities?,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, June 10, 2013. Accessed at http://chronicle.com/blognetwork/edgeofthewest/2013/06/10/the-humanities-crisis/
[3] Peter Lunenfeld, Anne Burdick, Johanna Drucker, Todd Presner and Jeffrey Schnapp, Digital_Humanities (Boston: The MIT Press, 2012)
[4] The Digital Humanities Manifesto 2.0. Accessed at http://manifesto.humanities.ucla.edu/2009/05/29/the-digital-humanities-manifesto-20/
[5] David Berry, Understanding Digital Humanities (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012). Accessed at http://books.google.ca/books/about/Understanding_Digital_Humanities.html?id=tCB_aGKxOFgC&redir_esc=y
Author Perspective: Educator