Published on 2012/03/16

DIALOGUE: Closing The Lifelong Learning Gap Between Universities And Society

DIALOGUE: Closing The Lifelong Learning Gap Between Universities And Society
Dialogue aims to create a more stable and reliable connection between academic research and professional practise in adult education. Photo by Supermac.

DIALOGUE is a project coordinated by EUCEN (European University Continuing Education Network) and is financed by the European Commission under the program Grundtvig. The initiative aims at creating a network involving LLL providers and researchers with relevant society stakeholders. This network addresses the particular aspect of the communication process between academic research and professional practice in the field of adult learning and continuing education. It is an area that needs serious and abridging research to improve the quality of the process. Therefore the consortium created within this project feels that the link university-society is weak in many institutions for a variety of historical, cultural national and institutional reasons.  The current processes of communication in both directions are underdeveloped and therefore there is little potential through this exchange for the enhancement and further development of effective University Lifelong Learning  (ULLL). A stronger relationship between the research, the policy and the practice could contribute in solving this problem. This network will seek to identify the kinds of research which are undertaken on adult education in European universities and how the research is used by different stakeholders including policy makers, practitioners and others in the field of adult education.

The aims of the project are to provide a European space for dialogue between academic researches, professional practitioners and policy makers, to improve the transfer of educational research into the field of professional practice in ULLL through the thematic involvement of practitioners in research and to improve policy and practice in the field of ULLL. The aims are achieved through:

  1. Development of the dialogue between research and practice around access and progression, quality assurance and enhancement, learning and guidance and new media;
  2. Reviewing, developing and evaluating models of good practice in the transfer of research results to professional practice exploring ways if involving practitioners in research;
  3. Identifying and exploring the barriers and constraints at national and institutional level to transfer the knowledge;
  4. Exploring and evaluating the role of national and international networks in the transfer of research to professional practice;
  5. Developing appropriate recommendations targeting networks, policy-makers and decision-makers, researching bodies and institutional actors at all levels.

The network has four thematic groups: Access & Progression, Learning and Guidance, Quality and New Media. The consortium has sixteen partners from which fourteen belong to two of the thematic groups. Each member of each thematic group is producing a case study about the theme. Each partner is writing a national report about the good practices, national policies and activities in LLL. The project has a website where the public information is available. The partners are using the Mixxt platform to interact and discuss issues related with the thematic group or with the project.

The partners are motivated to engage in the research since it is envisaged that, at the end of the project, there will be tools that can help:

  1. To engage more  people in LLL;
  2. To find new ways of lifelong learning including flexible learning;
  3. To create linkages and transitions between sectors of education and society;
  4. To acquire new skills and qualifications;
  5. To improve quality of learning including links between life and work.

The main motivation of the project is the need to build bridges between ULLL and society. These connections will allow people to share ideas and to fulfill the gap that frequently exists between academic environment and society practices. Therefore the role of the network created in the project is to clarify its role and to calculate the impact in the society. It is expected that the community, composed by members of scientific, practice and professional sectors, will allow the interaction that will improve effective dialogue.

The current work undertaken by the network consists in representing graphically the case studies to illustrate weak and strong ties between the different stakeholders. This step will be followed by a SWOT analysis of the case studies taking into account the aims of the project. This analysis will provide a set of recommendations that will be disseminated among the main interested parties like government agencies, universities, industry, professional organizations, training bodies and service providers.

Print Friendly
New call-to-action

Readers Comments

WA Anderson 2012/03/18 at 11:31 am

How seriously do you expect the recommendations to be taken? I would worry that if the proposed needs are too immense, the entire report will be ignored rather than the spirit being continued gradually.

Daniela Thomas 2012/03/21 at 11:32 am

That’s pretty cynical. I’d imagine working closely with governments and businesses would ensure that the final recommendations will be based off everyone’s shared opinion for solutions, not just one party. Right?

Julia 2012/03/27 at 7:10 am

Partners are working closely with their local and regional LLL networks to discuss the analysed case studies of cooperation between LLL researchers and practitioners, and to analyse cases of failed dialogue and respective role perceptions of researchers and practitioners. These discussions will lead to recommendations that are going to be shared with a wider community of stakeholders and policy-makers in order to receive their comments and views about the needs and findings. Therefore, the final recommendations will include shared views of many stakeholders.
These recommendations should be seen as a first step in the direction of strengthening and exploring possible ways of cooperation between researchers and practitioners. The character of this project is explorative and the final results will, thus, not claim to be exhaustive. They will rather be the synthesis of identified problems and solutions by various parties, which should enrich discussions and lead to new ideas.
If you would like to see the work in progress of this project, please visit http://dialogue.eucen.eu/. We will soon upload the case studies and national overviews. Please contact EUCEN at projects@eucen.org, if you would like to stay informed about the project.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

[if lte IE 8]
[if lte IE 8]