Higher education has never been short on big promises. For decades, we have told students they can be anything, change the world, or unlock their potential by choosing the right institution. While these messages are not incorrect, over time they have become abstract, less grounded and less specific. In today’s environment, abstraction does not build belief. It weakens it.
Most prospective students do not question the value of education. Instead, they wonder if it is meant for them, if it is affordable, if it fits their lives and if they belong. When higher education branding relies too much on aspiration without grounding itself in reality, it unintentionally widens this gap.
Higher education faces a credibility problem, not a messaging problem. When every possibility is promised, nothing feels authentic. A brief review of university websites or recruitment materials reveals a familiar pattern: bold headlines, sweeping claims, polished visuals, and very little specificity. We discuss the future but not the pathways to achieve it. We mention opportunity but not the tradeoffs. We promise support but rarely explain how it is provided day to day.
By trying to appeal to everyone, we often fail to truly connect with anyone. This approach does not stem from bad intentions but from caution—a fear of being too narrow, of excluding others and of confronting the complexity and humanity inherent in education. However, belief is not built on perfection but on recognition. Students do not need to be convinced that their future matters. They need reassurance that their version of the future—uncertain, constrained and still developing—is valid and supported.
From Aspiration to Proximity
The most effective brand stories today are not distant or idealized. They feel relatable and close. They meet people where they are, not only geographically or demographically but also emotionally. They acknowledge uncertainty, normalize struggle and replace the myth of a flawless journey with the reality of taking the next step.
This distinction is important. “You can go anywhere” is inspiring. “Here’s how people like you are moving forward” is credible.
When we reviewed our own messaging, we realized how often we spoke in ideals: futures, possibility and transformation. While these are true, they are often disconnected from the realities students face each day. This realization led us to focus on language rooted in proximity: the idea that opportunity does not need to feel distant or abstract to be meaningful. It must feel within reach, not as a slogan but as a guiding principle.
This language acknowledges distance without exaggeration. It implies effort without judgment and frames progress as something students actively pursue rather than something institutions grant. This shift changed the conversation. Instead of asking whether education could change their lives someday, students began asking a more practical question: Can this fit into my life right now?
Human Stories Are Not Merely Testimonials but Proof
The same principle applies to storytelling. In higher education, student stories are often treated as decoration, such as a quote in the margin or a polished video that feels more like an endorsement than an authentic experience. However, human stories should not be an afterthought. They should form the foundation.
The most effective stories do not declare excellence. They demonstrate trust. They show how individuals navigate uncertainty, weigh tradeoffs and continue moving forward. These stories include friction, decision points and imperfection. For us, this meant focusing less on polished outcomes and more on people navigating complexity in real time, balancing work, family, finances, uncertainty and ambition simultaneously. These are not just testimonials but lived experiences and moments of recognition.
The goal was not to inspire through perfection but to create space for honesty. We aimed to show that progress is often uneven, confidence builds gradually and support is most valuable during the journey, not only at the finish line. When stories focus on process rather than outcome, a subtle shift occurs. Audiences stop evaluating institutions and begin to see themselves. This transition from admiration to identification is where belief begins.
Within Reach Is Not Simply Optimism—It Is Honesty
Language matters because it signals intent. Phrases like our new campaign “Within reach” resonate not because they promise ease but because they respect reality. They acknowledge effort, assume agency and avoid exaggeration. In an era of growing skepticism toward institutions, this restraint builds trust.
This isn’t about lowering ambition. It is about making ambition believable. When higher education brands stop selling inevitability and start supporting momentum, the relationship changes. Institutions shift from distant arbiters of success to active partners in progress. Partnership, especially now, is far more compelling than polish.
What This Means for Higher Ed Leaders
Moving beyond abstraction does not require abandoning aspiration. It requires discipline.
It means asking harder questions:
- Are we describing real experiences or idealized ones?
- Are we showing journeys or just outcomes?
- Are we speaking to students or merely about them?
Sometimes the most powerful message an institution can offer is not grand, but simple: We see you. This is hard. Here’s how we help.
The institutions that stand out in the next chapter of higher education will not be the loudest or the most polished. They will be the most believable, the most human and the most present. Because belief isn’t built by hype. It is built when opportunity feels close enough to reach and real enough to trust.
You Might Also Like
