Published on 2014/09/10

Relationships = Retention: Embracing Non-Traditional Students on College Campuses (Part 1)

Relationships = Retention: Embracing Non-Traditional Students on College Campuses (Part 1)
Non-traditional students return to college for a wide variety of reasons, but institutions must pay particular attention to making sure they have the support they need to succeed.
Look around a typical college and you will see a great diversity of students working toward their postsecondary credentials and degrees. While some campuses still predominately serve students who have come directly from high school with the goal of completing college educations before entering the workforce and focusing on family life, an increasing number of campuses serve students who arrive from different junctures in their lives.

In addition to what we think of as the “typical” college student, there are students who have returned to school after participating in the workforce or attending to family. Some of these students had rocky starts to their education when they were younger, and some never completed their high school diploma. There are those who are slowly and steadily working toward a degree one class at a time, and others are stepping in and out of their educations or swirling between institutions as they negotiate other responsibilities.[1] Perhaps because of this added life experience of juggling responsibilities, adult students often come to campus with strong goals in mind and an appreciation for how a certificate or degree can help them achieve their broader goals.[2] Along with strengths born of “real world” experience, these students may also bring challenges or even scars from their unsuccessful high school attempts.

Students leave high school for all sorts of reasons. Some struggled academically; others suffered in a negative social climate; and for others family responsibilities or hardships required their attention to the detriment of school.[3] Many of these students re-engaged with their education during their high school years through alternative schools, credit recovery, or programs like those hosted by my organization, Gateway to College National Network, that allow people to complete their high school diplomas through dual credit programs on college campuses. When re-engagement during high school is not an option, others return to school as adults, often after spending time in the workforce.

In a small study of about 200 Gateway to College students who left the program before earning their high school diploma, over half re-engaged with education and their educational paths took multiple routes.[4] Some students earned their diploma, then a certificate, and then enrolled in a four-year institution. Others earned a GED, took a break, and then jumped into an Associate’s program. The list of possible variations to re-engagement goes on. Recognizing that these multiple pathways through higher education exist makes it easier to anticipate the unique needs of these students. For example, adults heading back to school after a long period of disengagement are likely to have rusty academic skills and may need additional support to refresh their skills and knowledge or fill in any gaps they may have.

For those without the benefit of previous success in academic settings, extra assistance in negotiating the steps to certificate and degree completion may be necessary. Regardless of whether they choose full time schedules if they are working and or parenting while pursuing their education, they will not have time to linger on campus.

This is the first installment of a two-part series by Devora Shamah on how institutions can better-serve non-traditional students returning to higher education after stopping out of high school. In the second installment, Shamah discusses some strategies that are particularly effective in supporting the retention and academic success of these learners.

– – – –


[1] McCormick, A. C. (2003). Swirling and Double-Dipping: New Patterns of Student Attendance and Their Implications for Higher Education. New Directions for Higher Education, (121), 13.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Readers Comments

Mary Moore 2014/09/12 at 10:57 am

At some point, we need to ask ourselves if the cost of branching out to serve all these niche markets is worth the return we get from serving them. This type of student would need a great deal of support, not just in terms of the support the average non-trad needs (even down to readiness), but they even need to make up the education they missed from not finishing high school. These costs would not be reflected in the tuition/fees charged, especially since those are frozen in many cases, so at some point it must become clear that we are losing money on every high school dropout we serve.

Parker Emmett 2014/09/12 at 11:34 am

I hate to admit it, but I agree with Mary Moore. At first her comment made me angry, but then I realized she’s right. With tuition and fees frozen, we can’t afford to provide all the support resources these students would need to graduate. Moreover, it’s unfair to students who don’t need that level of attention to provide them less in order to provide at-risk and needy students with more. Maybe this group is a bridge too far, but we’ll see what strategies you present next week.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *