Increase Revenue with Modern Continuing Education Software
How using modern eCommerce principles drives revenue in Continuing Education
As a society, we must own our obligation to provide a way to welcome veterans back to the community, due to their service in the military. Institutions of higher learning—because of their unique position outside of, but frequently in partnership with government, and the public and private sectors—are well poised to take the lead in this venture. Higher education institutions need to extend their expertise in building community partnerships to build a service network for veterans that includes the Veterans Administration and the public and private sectors. Internally, veterans’ services in colleges and universities must function as the core of an institution’s network to support veteran students, as opposed to stand-alone offices that process benefits. The primary goal should be to recognize and value the fact that veterans bring skills and experiences back into society that should be embraced and leveraged to strengthen the community.
In support of veteran reintegration, institutions of higher education can implement the core of what we as continuing educators do: providing excellent academic resources and constructing community partnerships. As the mission of higher education has been to serve the public through teaching and research, as well as a myriad of community partnerships, it must also be expanded to provide a meaningful role in the community for those who have served. Higher education has a long history of creating interactive processes involving government, corporations, and community organizations. We can build on these processes to create an active network that supports veterans upon separation from the military throughout their lives and careers. The reintegration of veterans into civilian academic and professional arenas is a local community function. There is a need for collaboration among institutions of higher education, nonprofits that serve veterans, and the Veterans Administration to facilitate the process of societal adaptation of veterans into academic and professional communities, and to ensure the shared, mutual ownership of this process and these communities among stakeholders.
Years in a military environment can condition an individual to follow a prescribed order and set of rules—a type of bureaucracy that is not paralleled in academic or professional environments in the private sector. The coordination of services upon separation from the military and throughout the reintegration process could assure that guidance and expertise is provided to veterans through veteran’s services centers, as well as referral to external support networks for counseling and employment services. As I mentioned in a previous article, “veterans can find the structures and bureaucracies of colleges and universities challenging and difficult to negotiate, and a centralized resource to demystify and make transparent the policies and procedures is a solid investment that saves time and streamlines the experience of veterans as they become oriented to dramatic changes in life, work and study environments.”
The re-integration of veterans requires a two-way adaptation; society needs to adapt to the changes in the individuals and society needs to give these veterans a meaningful role in the community (social, academic, professional, vocational). We need to:
Institutions of higher education can identify all stakeholders such as partner colleges and universities, nonprofits that serve veterans, the Veterans Administration, and corporations. In collaboration, these entities can develop a structure that mirrors the mission and values and strengths of the region and tie the university-based organization into the local infrastructure that supports veterans. A leadership core from each sector could develop a leadership and decision-making process that is cooperative and engages and listens to everyone. Further, the strengths of each should be leveraged rather than duplicated. Educational institutions, from community colleges to public and private research universities, should focus on their strengths in teaching, and work in collaboration to create channels for veterans where their educational needs are best met. Similarly, the expertise of the VA and that of organizations that address workforce development, child and family development, substance abuse and homelessness, should be leveraged in this partnership.
In an era when we as academic leaders are looking closely at the definition of credit hours, and working to ensure that our curricula lead to the development of specific competencies across disciplines, we must expand this evaluation to competencies that veterans bring from their military experience. Beyond programs like the College Level Examination Program (CLEP) and Defense Activity for Non-Traditional Education Support (DANTES), we need to construct methods of mapping competencies from the military, such as leadership, cross-cultural awareness and communication, inter-cultural communication, fluency in multiple languages, written and oral communication, quantitative reasoning, et cetera.
We have learned from past and present military conflicts the tragic consequences of failed reintegration of veterans. First and foremost, the initiative must seek to meet the needs of veterans in the social, academic, and work spheres; bringing the whole person back in, psychologically, academically and professionally. Veterans need a meaningful role in the community (jobs, education and mentoring, either as the mentor or mentee). Institutions of higher learning across the nation can lead initiatives that support and facilitate the adaptation of veterans into academic, professional and social communities.
Some examples of activities to support university internal and external networks for veterans:
Co-curricular opportunities:
Student Services:
External Partnerships:
How using modern eCommerce principles drives revenue in Continuing Education
Author Perspective: Administrator
Community partnerships are so important, and they can be so innovative and helpful for veterans. Beyond health and psychological services, employment coaching, housing organizations, et cetera–the very important basics–there are organizations helping veterans in creative and productive ways.
I’m thinking of The Telling Project (a theatrical organization that provides veterans with theatrical training and then helps them and their families to tell their stories of serving on stage, to their local communities). I think beyond providing the basics for veteran students, showing them you care by partnering with a project such as this could make a huge difference.
The key to being “military friendly” is I think to actually consult your veteran students. Maybe you’ve got a handful of veteran students: pick their brains, get them at a brainstorming session. Find out how they feel, what they want, what’s working and what isn’t.
Make that a permanent thing–give your veteran students on campus a voice and a forum for discussion and support–both from each other and from the institution.
One demographic not really mentioned explicitly here, that I think is a crucial one to pay attention to when it comes to veteran students, is veteran students with disabilities. First of all, for many of them, their disability is something they have acquired recently, and something they are grappling with–they may not even have become accustomed to the language needed, and they may not know what or how they need to ask to get what they need to make your institution work for them.
With a disability, often the cost of living ramps up for these veterans, as they make all the necessary adjustments to their housing, transportation, and other types of assistance. It is important that higher education institutions focus some real attention on veterans with disabilities; find out what they need, and develop strategies to help them overcome barriers to education– financial being a big one, but also physical, mental, et cetera.